annathyst: (Default)
Anna ([personal profile] annathyst) wrote2005-12-31 10:29 pm

(no subject)

Dear everyone who posted a LJ entry to note the fact that their computers inserted the leap second properly:


NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDS!

[identity profile] pyrop.livejournal.com 2006-01-01 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
I'm on an ancient win98 box, i'm just glad that it deals with the regular seconds ok.
halkeye: (Default)

[personal profile] halkeye 2006-01-01 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
its not new years for another 4 hours!

[identity profile] sneakums.livejournal.com 2006-01-01 12:21 pm (UTC)(link)
The leap second is inserted at midnight UTC, not local time.

[identity profile] endril.livejournal.com 2006-01-01 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
teferi, you are like the biggest nerd I know, which is saying a lot. I mean, you posted an entry about people posting about the leap second.
chemicallace: My personal avatar, a lady with a flask. (Default)

[personal profile] chemicallace 2006-01-01 07:46 am (UTC)(link)
I am pleased to say that you are the only person on my friends list that mentioned it on LiveJournal.

But I do have friends that asked how I would spend my extra second...

[identity profile] bz2.livejournal.com 2006-01-01 11:58 am (UTC)(link)
I spent half an hour reading about how Unix time deals with leap seconds and the pros and cons of making Unix time a representation of UTC rather than an exact tally of number of seconds since the epoch. Does that count?

[identity profile] pointy111.livejournal.com 2006-01-01 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
/signed

[identity profile] yellowpigs.livejournal.com 2006-01-02 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm ... good thing I don't post to LJ.

[identity profile] ragdollnezzy.livejournal.com 2006-01-14 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)
hey! I just found your journal randomly. Mind if I add you? :)