annathyst: (Default)
[personal profile] annathyst
Dear everyone who posted a LJ entry to note the fact that their computers inserted the leap second properly:


NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDS!

Date: 2006-01-01 03:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyrop.livejournal.com
I'm on an ancient win98 box, i'm just glad that it deals with the regular seconds ok.

Date: 2006-01-01 04:05 am (UTC)
halkeye: (Default)
From: [personal profile] halkeye
its not new years for another 4 hours!

Date: 2006-01-01 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sneakums.livejournal.com
The leap second is inserted at midnight UTC, not local time.

Date: 2006-01-01 06:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endril.livejournal.com
teferi, you are like the biggest nerd I know, which is saying a lot. I mean, you posted an entry about people posting about the leap second.

Date: 2006-01-01 07:46 am (UTC)
chemicallace: My personal avatar, a lady with a flask. (Default)
From: [personal profile] chemicallace
I am pleased to say that you are the only person on my friends list that mentioned it on LiveJournal.

But I do have friends that asked how I would spend my extra second...

Date: 2006-01-01 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bz2.livejournal.com
I spent half an hour reading about how Unix time deals with leap seconds and the pros and cons of making Unix time a representation of UTC rather than an exact tally of number of seconds since the epoch. Does that count?

Date: 2006-01-01 08:13 pm (UTC)

Date: 2006-01-02 02:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yellowpigs.livejournal.com
Hmm ... good thing I don't post to LJ.

Date: 2006-01-14 07:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ragdollnezzy.livejournal.com
hey! I just found your journal randomly. Mind if I add you? :)
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 12:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios