Anna (
annathyst
) wrote
2005
-
12
-
31
10:29 pm
(no subject)
Dear everyone who posted a LJ entry to note the fact that their computers inserted the leap second properly:
NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDS!
Threaded
|
Flat
no subject
pyrop.livejournal.com
2006-01-01 03:51 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I'm on an ancient win98 box, i'm just glad that it deals with the regular seconds ok.
no subject
halkeye
2006-01-01 04:05 am (UTC)
(
link
)
its not new years for another 4 hours!
(no subject)
sneakums.livejournal.com
-
2006-01-01 12:21 (UTC)
-
Expand
no subject
endril.livejournal.com
2006-01-01 06:10 am (UTC)
(
link
)
teferi, you are like the biggest nerd I know, which is saying a lot. I mean, you posted an entry about people posting about the leap second.
no subject
chemicallace
2006-01-01 07:46 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I am pleased to say that you are the only person on my friends list that mentioned it on LiveJournal.
But I do have friends that asked how I would spend my extra second...
no subject
bz2.livejournal.com
2006-01-01 11:58 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I spent half an hour reading about how Unix time deals with leap seconds and the pros and cons of making Unix time a representation of UTC rather than an exact tally of number of seconds since the epoch. Does that count?
no subject
pointy111.livejournal.com
2006-01-01 08:13 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
/signed
no subject
yellowpigs.livejournal.com
2006-01-02 02:44 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Hmm ... good thing I don't post to LJ.
no subject
ragdollnezzy.livejournal.com
2006-01-14 07:42 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
hey! I just found your journal randomly. Mind if I add you?
:)
9 comments
Post a new comment
Threaded
|
Flat
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
But I do have friends that asked how I would spend my extra second...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
:)